We have received text from H.R. 10125: No Preferential Release Of Federal Information for Transactions Act. This bill was received on 2026-08-20, and currently has 5 cosponsors.
Here is a short summary of the bill:
This bill would make it illegal to use
private, early-access information from certain government officials’ social media accounts
to make trades or other financial bets before that information is publicly available.
What accounts and people are covered
The bill applies to social media accounts controlled by:
-
The President and Vice President
-
Members of Congress and congressional staff
-
Executive branch employees, including many political appointees and some military and postal workers
-
Judges and judicial employees
-
Certain family members of those officials
It also covers some people acting on behalf of those officials or agencies. The coverage continues for 180 days after the person leaves office or the covered job.
What information is covered
The bill focuses on
material information
shared through a covered government official’s social media account. “Material” means information that a reasonable investor would consider important when deciding whether to trade.
The bill also defines “prioritized access” as getting access to that communication earlier than the public, or getting it through a method that gives a meaningful timing or access advantage over ordinary users.
What would be prohibited
If someone knows, or should know, that they are seeing this nonpublic information through prioritized access, they could not:
-
Buy or sell securities, security-based swaps, commodities, futures, options, or swaps based on that information
-
Cause someone else to make such a trade
-
Pass the information to someone else when they know, or should know, that the other person is likely to trade on it before it becomes public
The bill says this would apply even if there was no breach of a fiduciary duty or similar duty of trust.
How it would be enforced
For trades involving securities or security-based swaps, the Securities and Exchange Commission could enforce the rule using the same tools it uses for certain insider-trading cases.
For commodities, futures, options, swaps, and similar markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission could enforce it under similar authority. The two agencies would have to issue joint rules within 180 days after enactment.
Limits on social media platforms
The bill would also prohibit social media platforms from knowingly selling, licensing, or otherwise providing prioritized access to communications from covered government accounts.
However, it would not stop platforms from:
-
Using ordinary algorithmic feeds or personalized ranking for users
-
Giving emergency or public safety agencies special access for health, safety, or disaster communications
-
Providing API or data-licensing access on reasonable, non-discriminatory terms, so long as it does not let recipients see the communication earlier than the general public or gain a paid timing advantage
If a platform violates this rule, it could face a civil penalty equal to the revenue it received from the improper prioritized access. The Attorney General could sue to collect that penalty.
Relevant Companies
-
META
- Could be affected because the bill restricts how social media platforms can provide early or special access to covered government accounts, including through paid or licensed access arrangements.
-
GOOGL
- Could be affected for the same reason if its social media or platform services provide prioritized access to government account communications.
-
X
- Could be affected if its platform offers premium, API, or other access arrangements involving covered government accounts and their communications.
-
SNAP
- Could be affected if it provides platform features that give users early or differentiated access to covered official communications.
-
TTD
- Could be indirectly affected if ad-tech or data-licensing arrangements involving social media content are used to provide prioritized access prohibited by the bill.
Representative James A. Himes Bill Proposals
Here are some bills which have recently been proposed by Representative James A. Himes:
- H.R.10125: NO PROFIT Act
- H.R.9983: Lori Jackson-Nicolette Elias Domestic Violence Survivor Protection Act
- H.R.7792: Property Improvement and Manufactured Housing Loan Modernization Act of 2026
- H.R.3542: CLEAR (Committee Leadership and Enhanced Accountability for Resilience) Defense Production Act of 2025
- H.R.3395: Middle Market IPO Cost Act
You can track bills proposed by Representative James A. Himes on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
Representative James A. Himes Net Worth
Quiver Quantitative estimates that Representative James A. Himes is worth $13.7M, as of August 21st, 2026. This is the 95th highest net worth in Congress, per our live estimates.
Himes has approximately $178.9K invested in publicly traded assets which Quiver is able to track live.
You can track Representative James A. Himes's net worth on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
Representative James A. Himes Stock Trading
We have data on up to $415.0K of trades from Representative James A. Himes, which we parsed from STOCK Act filings. Some of the largest trades include:
- A July 20th, 2026 sale of up to $50K of $HD. The stock has risen 0.44% since then.
- A July 20th, 2026 sale of up to $50K of $XOM. The stock has risen 11.99% since then.
- A July 20th, 2026 sale of up to $15K of $BAC. The stock has risen 2.38% since then.
You can track Representative James A. Himes's stock trading on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
2026 Connecticut's 4th Congressional District Election
There has been approximately $1,975,686 of spending in Connecticut's 4th congressional district elections over the last two years, per our estimates.
The rating for this race is currently "Solid D".
You can track this election on our matchup page for the 2026 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election.
This article is not financial advice. See Quiver Quantitative's disclaimers for more information.
Read full article here »
Representative James A. Himes introduces H.R. 10125: No Preferential Release Of Federal Information for Transactions Act
We have received text from H.R. 10125: No Preferential Release Of Federal Information for Transactions Act. This bill was received on 2026-08-20, and currently has 5 cosponsors.
Here is a short summary of the bill:
This bill would make it illegal to use private, early-access information from certain government officials’ social media accounts to make trades or other financial bets before that information is publicly available.
What accounts and people are covered
The bill applies to social media accounts controlled by:
It also covers some people acting on behalf of those officials or agencies. The coverage continues for 180 days after the person leaves office or the covered job.
What information is covered
The bill focuses on material information shared through a covered government official’s social media account. “Material” means information that a reasonable investor would consider important when deciding whether to trade.
The bill also defines “prioritized access” as getting access to that communication earlier than the public, or getting it through a method that gives a meaningful timing or access advantage over ordinary users.
What would be prohibited
If someone knows, or should know, that they are seeing this nonpublic information through prioritized access, they could not:
The bill says this would apply even if there was no breach of a fiduciary duty or similar duty of trust.
How it would be enforced
For trades involving securities or security-based swaps, the Securities and Exchange Commission could enforce the rule using the same tools it uses for certain insider-trading cases.
For commodities, futures, options, swaps, and similar markets, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission could enforce it under similar authority. The two agencies would have to issue joint rules within 180 days after enactment.
Limits on social media platforms
The bill would also prohibit social media platforms from knowingly selling, licensing, or otherwise providing prioritized access to communications from covered government accounts.
However, it would not stop platforms from:
If a platform violates this rule, it could face a civil penalty equal to the revenue it received from the improper prioritized access. The Attorney General could sue to collect that penalty.
Relevant Companies
Representative James A. Himes Bill Proposals
Here are some bills which have recently been proposed by Representative James A. Himes:
You can track bills proposed by Representative James A. Himes on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
Representative James A. Himes Net Worth
Quiver Quantitative estimates that Representative James A. Himes is worth $13.7M, as of August 21st, 2026. This is the 95th highest net worth in Congress, per our live estimates.
Himes has approximately $178.9K invested in publicly traded assets which Quiver is able to track live.
You can track Representative James A. Himes's net worth on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
Representative James A. Himes Stock Trading
We have data on up to $415.0K of trades from Representative James A. Himes, which we parsed from STOCK Act filings. Some of the largest trades include:
You can track Representative James A. Himes's stock trading on Quiver Quantitative's politician page for Himes.
2026 Connecticut's 4th Congressional District Election
There has been approximately $1,975,686 of spending in Connecticut's 4th congressional district elections over the last two years, per our estimates.
The rating for this race is currently "Solid D".
You can track this election on our matchup page for the 2026 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election.
This article is not financial advice. See Quiver Quantitative's disclaimers for more information.
Read full article here »